Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Dashie Does NOT approve by Tartii Dashie Does NOT approve by Tartii
For REAL.
What is WITH all this pony erotica showing up on DA? And on the FRONT PAGE? So far I have seen two images that just...bother me greatly. And if they bother ME, weheeelll how must the ponies feel? D:

Dashie, Im sure, would be DISGUSTED while surfing the internet and finding this stuff D:

Im sure most of you know what Im talking about. I wont point fingers but...come on guys its a show for CHILDREN. About ponies teaching morals and all sorts of things! They are NOT lesbians having special 'sleepovers', nor are they sexual icons D:

If your guna draw that stuff, keep it mature or in your respective community. x-x''
Add a Comment:
 
:iconsimulatorwave:
SimulatorWave Featured By Owner Feb 2, 2015
You really should have a small signature or DeviantArt tag or something cus there is are many people turning things like this into extremely popular memes..
Reply
:icontartii:
Tartii Featured By Owner Feb 9, 2015  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Yeah but alas it is too late now to bother adding signatures. n@
Reply
:iconsimulatorwave:
SimulatorWave Featured By Owner Feb 2, 2015
Thank gawd, this took me so friken long to find the original! This really is awesome!
Reply
:iconcatfromdream:
CatFromDream Featured By Owner Jun 21, 2014
That expression is perfect! :D

Now it only needs sound...
Reply
:iconpsychotic5ilence:
Psychotic5ilence Featured By Owner Oct 26, 2013  Student Digital Artist
I have nothin against gays or lesbians, but those posts kinda went overboard.
like, waay overboard.
Reply
:icondominatrix-tryn:
Dominatrix-Tryn Featured By Owner Apr 28, 2013
I agree. Not to mention, these ponies aren't even fully mature yet (as far as I know), so isn't that...

Eugh, I'd rather not think on it. ><; Beautiful pic though!
Reply
:iconsubject--delta:
Subject--Delta Featured By Owner Apr 13, 2013  Student Traditional Artist
I laughed so hard when i saw this i pee'd myself. good work on the.........ROFLMFAO...........on your work. HA HA HA HA HA! HA HA HA! *snort* HA HA HA HA! HER FACE IS JUST BLAH! HA HA HA HA HA!
Reply
:icontehmaster001:
TehMaster001 Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Her reaction to "Cupcakes".
Reply
:iconobsidiandovah:
Obsidiandovah Featured By Owner Mar 30, 2013
Rule 34 no exception.... Oh god not cthulhu.... Not lord cthulhu!
Reply
:icontartii:
Tartii Featured By Owner Mar 30, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
OUR LORD
NO
Reply
:iconselinmarsou:
selinmarsou Featured By Owner Mar 24, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I completely agree with you!
I haven't got problem with the erotic pictures, but when they do it with Ponies...ugh... I just can't stand it.
At least they set the mature content >.< And still have pictures out there what NEED the mature content in my opinion.
By the way your Dashie is fabulous ^^ I really love her eyes, and expression. Nice work!
Reply
:iconfanaticalpokeblack:
fanaticalpokeblack Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2013  Student Artist
bronys + is this hell = WHAT THE HELL BOYS LUV PONYS?
Reply
:iconhatsunehaku:
HatsuneHaku Featured By Owner Aug 7, 2013

because they can.

Don't judge a book by it's cover.

People can like what they like.

Reply
:iconfanaticalpokeblack:
fanaticalpokeblack Featured By Owner Aug 10, 2013  Student Artist
i know T_T just making my opinion
Reply
:iconhatsunehaku:
HatsuneHaku Featured By Owner Aug 10, 2013

sorry

didn't mean to hurt your feelings ;w;

Reply
:iconfanaticalpokeblack:
fanaticalpokeblack Featured By Owner Aug 10, 2013  Student Artist
um lol you didn't hurt my feelings ^_^
Reply
:iconelchornholio11:
ElChornholio11 Featured By Owner Feb 5, 2013  Hobbyist
So right you are.
Reply
:iconsketchl:
Sketchl Featured By Owner Jan 12, 2013  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Gross, hands.
Reply
:iconlioru92:
Lioru92 Featured By Owner Oct 12, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Beautiful style ;) And I do think that sort of stuff should be tagged ^^; Or on art sites designed more for older groups or directly for that sort of thing. They'd get their target audience then, right? lol
Reply
:iconberneri:
Berneri Featured By Owner Oct 8, 2012  Student General Artist
Thank you. I completely agree with you. <_>
Reply
:icondemonicanomaly:
DemonicAnomaly Featured By Owner Oct 7, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
You know this entire brony thing emanated from 4chan in its infancy, and spread to places like this as time went on, right? It started with the disturbing stuff. The majority (>70%) of the fandom itself is a bit on the "off" side as a result.

I'm not bashing legitimate fans of this show... nor am I saying that you are part of that other group. I feel sorry for them, honestly. But I wouldn't expect it to stop. Like most cancers, It'll probably last a while.

All that said, this expression is absolutely priceless... nice illustration of the reaction! (Stay strong out there :XD: )
Reply
:iconpyre-vulpimorph:
Pyre-Vulpimorph Featured By Owner Jan 12, 2013
>>The majority (>70%) of the fandom itself is a bit on the "off" side as a result.

Nice fallacy. Any other numbers you'd like to pull out of your ass, today? :roll:

You know, this entire brony thing emanated from 4chan's REACTION to Cartoon Brew's idiotic article about "The End Of Creator-Driven Media" or some crap, with MLP-FiM being the article's primary punching bag, and Kathleen Richter's equally moronic and ill-informed article on Ms. Magazine, "My Little Racist, Homophobic, Smart-Shaming Pony". While I make no excuses for what 4chan is, it is one of the internet's greatest IRONIES that a large group of adult fans who genuinely adore the show and its characters came from there. And yes, most of the show's fans are mentally NORMAL.

I feel sorry for you, honestly. But I wouldn't expect an outsider like you to actually do the research. Like most cancers, ignorance and bigotry will probably last a while. :roll:
Reply
:icondemonicanomaly:
DemonicAnomaly Featured By Owner Jan 12, 2013  Hobbyist Writer
I'll stand by my number, however disturbing it might be to you, thanks. Besides, calling it a fallacy is a bit harsh. An estimate, sure. You should lurk moar to see what I mean.

Wow, didn't expect any raeg from a shoddy opinion like this. Shows you've truly got better things to do every day than whine and complain about other people. I hope you got your mental gratification from it at least. What else are you lacking?

You sound a lot like a bigot yourself, sir... or mam? IDK. Doesn't really matter :shrug:
Reply
:iconmosikitty:
MosiKitty Featured By Owner Oct 5, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
LOL! Epic pic x) Seeing as it's a show for kids and the ponies are kids themselves, hell they're learning about friendship and such for the first time, there's no reason to put them into porn. I mean I'm sort of a brony myself but I love this pic. -not a big fan of cloppers tbh- I love the innocence and cheer of the show personally. It's cute and that's what makes it watchable for me. Great work on the picture and hope to see more awesome work from you soon!
Reply
:iconviethra-schepherd:
Viethra-Schepherd Featured By Owner Oct 5, 2012
I'm sorry, but I couldn't resist replying to this. Twilight is a socially awkward loner, not a child normally encountering friendship for the first time. She is learning about friendship because she has been antisocial her whole life until Celestia kicked her out of
college to organize a national holiday. The people she socializes with all have jobs. I agree the the innocence and sincerity of the show are integral to its appeal, but the protagonists are not kids. The CMC are kids. I can't tell you how much it bothers me when people draw those three that way, but they are obviously kids! I can't be the only one who thinks this.
Reply
:iconwarhead:
warhead Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2012
I see MLP and Homestuck porn the same way: they are fuckin' kids. Why are we allowing porn art of them? Same as cub shit isn't it? I don't understand how it's allowed. /shrug.
Reply
:iconfrancissplinter:
FrancisSplinter Featured By Owner Oct 6, 2012
MLP Characters are all adults. Characters like Apple Bloom, Scootaloo etc. are kids. Just saying.
Reply
:iconviethra-schepherd:
Viethra-Schepherd Featured By Owner Oct 5, 2012
Are the characters in Homestuck really kids? Everyone in the comic is like, two feet tall. How can you tell? Anyway, where is all this porn people are talking about, because DA doesn't allow "porn" as it is usually understood? Unless you are meaning fanservice or pinups.
Reply
:iconwarhead:
warhead Featured By Owner Oct 5, 2012
Because Hussie wrote that they are 13.
Reply
:iconviethra-schepherd:
Viethra-Schepherd Featured By Owner Oct 6, 2012
Thank you, that helps a lot. I'm one of those people who keeps reading the first thousand pages and then loses track. I don't actually care about whether there is rule34 of Homestuck I was just trying to be funny. I failed, for that I apologize.
Reply
:iconwarhead:
warhead Featured By Owner Oct 6, 2012
It's the first page of the comic: [link]

"Though it was thirteen years ago he was given life [...]"
Reply
:iconviethra-schepherd:
Viethra-Schepherd Featured By Owner Oct 7, 2012
As good a reason as any to try to read it again, I guess.
Reply
:iconainoko-ironrose:
Ainoko-Ironrose Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2012
Plese cross post this on FA? PLEASE????
Reply
:icontartii:
Tartii Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
its there
Reply
:iconandythelazysheep:
AndyTheLazySheep Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Sexual and pornographic art of MLP:FiM has no business being on the front page (especially without a mature tag). If that's what you're saying, then I completely agree.
Reply
:iconmasterclockwork:
MasterClockwork Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2012
I would very much not see anything reaching the level of clop on DA, there are a lot of other places to post that. Far as saucy goes, totally fine with it.
Reply
:iconamitrixwolf:
amitrixwolf Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
Bronies SO SRS MAN. ERVERTHIN MUST BE TAKEN SRSLY.
Reply
:icontartii:
Tartii Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
ERRTHING.
Reply
:iconviethra-schepherd:
Viethra-Schepherd Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2012
I really don't get what is wrong with them being lesbians. There is nothing wrong with lesbians. There is nothing wrong with children having lesbian role-models or knowing they exist.

Besides that, the mane six are all adults. I can understand wanting to make sure people tag saucy images so that kids won't see them, but FiM being a show for children isn't a very strong reason to say its fanart can't have mature themes. Yeah, the adventures shown in the series must be appropriate for kids. That makes total sense. The fact that a character would never be shown doing something on screen due to television standards and the demographic doesn't indicate that they can't do something off screen. Characters go entire franchises never using the W.C. Does that make them incapable of such an action? Hardly. In the same way, any of the main six could pursue romantic interests as they are fully grown adults, and never be shown to do so. If a fan thinks they can tell that kind of a story about the characters, in a way the series can't, fan art and fan fiction empower them to do so. Now, fans need to be courteous of each other and the target audience, and valiant efforts have been made to do so.

Rainbow Dash is a government employee and national hero, with issues of petty competitiveness I'll admit, but it is hard for me to believe she would find the concept of kissing or whatever form of intimacy DA allows without a mature block to be that offensive. If you are saying she she is asexual, that is not well articulated here, but fine. If you are saying she went through adolescence, into adulthood, and home ownership not knowing about the birds and the bees and finding sex repulsive in the way a 9-year-old would, you are telling a story much more disturbing than the ones where the same mare finds love and partnership within her circle of good friends.

Your art is spectacular, and I don't want to discourage you. But every time I see this picture it makes me want to say something. If heterosexual pairs like Rarity/Spike or Mr.Cake/Mrs.Cake are acceptable on the show, so should homosexual pairs be, at least in fan work. Love exists in Equestria and in series canon. There is personally being uninterested in something due to aesthetics and then there is discouraging creative endeavors for reasons grounded in personal taste rather than actual ethics. They are not the same thing. You can choose to do either, but that fact doesn't change how unfair the latter option is.
Reply
:iconnekomuffin513:
nekomuffin513 Featured By Owner Mar 24, 2013
This.. sums up pretty perfectly anything I could possibly say in response to this image. Thank you.
Reply
:iconneo-nate:
NEO-Nate Featured By Owner Oct 6, 2012  Student Digital Artist
The sex is not canon, the characters are not lesbians, you just assumed she was complaining about the characters being lesbians, but the only porn of MLP mainly consists of lesbian porn since the majority of characters are female.

Also she's talking about the porn, not the show? Derp, I don't think I'd want my KIDS looking at porn.
Reply
:iconviethra-schepherd:
Viethra-Schepherd Featured By Owner Oct 7, 2012
She said "They are NOT lesbians having special 'sleepovers', nor are they..."

The whole point of my comment was about the implications of the things she said in the description. The actual show was brought up in the frame of mind that she meant what she said. She told me that the whole lesbian thing wasn't the issue, and I believe her.

There are grandparents, parents, babies, marriages, and romantic holidays in Equestria. It is really farfetched that there isn't sex. Besides all that, there's this... [link] Of course, I suppose this [link] fits your head canon more closely on the issue.

I don't want your hypothetical kids looking at porn of finding it on this website, either.
Reply
:icontartii:
Tartii Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
You....completely missed the point of this picture.
Reply
:iconviethra-schepherd:
Viethra-Schepherd Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2012
I tried to address everything you said in the description. Is your point that you think a lot of people are ignoring DA's content rules? If so, that is a problem that far outreaches bronies or the MLPFiM fandom or ponies as an artistic subject. The implications of this piece are all over the place. If you feel everything I've said here is irrelevant to the picture, I would be happy to hear what your true intentions were. I can't imagine they were all that different from eww shipping gross, keep your unnatural "intimacy" on FA,or don't ya know sentient beings other than humans reproduce by way of stork delivery?
Reply
:icontartii:
Tartii Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
You're comment implies that you read WAY too much into what I was saying. I don't care if people wana ship. If they wana ship then ship. My point is if you are going to be drawing anything suggestive or something not exactly child-safe or whatever...any 'fetish' material needs to be kepped under censorship. A child or anybody who doesn't wana see pony erotica shouldn't go to the front page and have it thrust in their face. It needs to be kept in its respectful area. I am not saying its bad, I am saying it needs to be in its PROPER. PLACE.
I also do not care if you want to view them as lesbians. Gentle fluff is fine. But 'sexual situations' don't belong on DA unless with proper warning labels/censores enabled.

And good grief I never said that this was just an issue with the Brony fandom. Anybody that knows me knows I don't have a single issue with shipping.
But people these days will find whatever reason they can to be offended.
Reply
:iconviethra-schepherd:
Viethra-Schepherd Featured By Owner Oct 5, 2012
You say a lot of things in the description. I'm not going to pretend I made everything I said up, because I didn't. Those things were there. You asserted those things whether you realized it.

I made the assumption you were only talking about Bronies because you didn't state otherwise. I was wrong about that, but it isn't really important to my point.

Only here, in this conversation, is the actual intent of the image clear. The description is all over the place. I'm not finding a reason to be offended, you provided it yourself when you were offended by the apparently insufficient censorship on this website. I mistook your simple message to be much more complicated than it was and voiced my thoughts on it. As it stands, this submission addresses a plethora of controversial ideas, and I'm not going to pretend DA's content policies were the most prominent. I do appreciate you answers to my questions, but honestly, I don't see how you can be surprised by my confusion.
Reply
:icontartii:
Tartii Featured By Owner Oct 5, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
It wasn't so much your confusion that surprised me, but more or less the ignorance of it. A situation of "stop not liking what I like! It offends me!" That is what it comes off as.
Reply
:iconviethra-schepherd:
Viethra-Schepherd Featured By Owner Oct 6, 2012
Well, actually people don't have to like things to defend them. I'm not black, but I am very critical of people who are prejudiced against African Americans.

I told you that personally being uninterested in something due to aesthetics is not the thing I took issue with.

Disagreeing with things you actually typed does not make me ignorant. Misunderstanding misleading and convoluted statements that have nothing to do with censorship is not an act of ignorance. Trying to UNDERSTAND what exactly this submission's point is meant to be is not ignorance. Deconstructing the presentation of a piece of art based on the flaws in the logic used in the arguments it is making for the sake of conveying reason is not ignorance. Even if my main motivation was as childish as "stop not liking what I like! It offends me!" that would not be ignorance.

Ignorance - The condition of being uninformed or uneducated. Lack of knowledge or information.

Willful Ignorance - A decision in bad faith to avoid becoming informed about something so as to avoid having to make undesirable decisions that such information might prompt.

I WANT to understand you, and I am typing these ungodly long paragraphs because I WANT you to understand me. I have LEARNED that the main thesis of this painting, and the description you gave it, is that the users of this website do not follow the acceptable content rules or follow submission guidelines.

You, you have contradicted yourself, failed to recognize my interest in understanding you, and given hints that you have misled me. Your taste has not offended me, it is your rudeness, and hypocrisy. Instead of trying to comprehend my statements or understand my point of view, you've subjected me to a stereotype. You know why I presented those 3 cartoonish views of what you might be trying to tell me? The reason was that you didn't tell me! You just said I missed the point. The thing is, I did tell you what the situation was, explicitly, yet you still think this is some generic ERRTHING MUST BE TAKEN SO SRSLY HOW DERR YOU NOT LIEK WAT AH LIEK situation.

When you state your disapproval of something, those who disagree with you are not being ignorant merely because they express offense. The act of not liking something, is the act of being offended. You are offended, and they are in turn. WHY you are offended can be challenged, and the grounds on which the challenge is made can be questioned, but no matter how it ends, you two are the same in one respect. You are offended.

I hate having to explain this to you as I'm not even the hypothetical party I just defended. I took interest in this submission because it was confusing and because it contained logically dubious assertions. Have fun reading this because I'm not going to be unfairly insulted and misrepresented and go unheard. If you STILL have any questions I can answer them, but please, think first.
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
February 28, 2012
Image Size
958 KB
Resolution
962×947
Submitted with
Sta.sh
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
17,547 (4 today)
Favourites
1,194 (who?)
Comments
456
Downloads
1,539
×